To the rational logical mind solid seems solid, then along comes quantum stuff and if you really think you understand it says Neils Bohr your kidding yourself. So astrophysicist's have this dilemma as well. I certainly do. It is known that everything is composed of particles to atoms to molecules and then somehow to differing forms. How so say the many? Who collated and arranged the cake mixture ingredients to form the cake. Ah God, so who arranged to form God? It was a big bang, an accident, how did the accident form and an accident implies that something caused the accident and we go round in koan or the wheel of karma or like the hamster / gerbil on there wheel in the cage.
So we have a Universe built on the building blocks of the the particle / atom structure and it is known the atom is 99.99% empty and yet here one is a solid entity or at least coalesced into form, held together by strong / weak nuclear forces and the actions of centripetal and centrifugal forces and gravity. Then we have the view of a great scientist The stream of knowledge is heading towards a non-mechanical reality; the Universe begins to look more like a great thought than like a great machine. Mind no longer appears to be an accidental intruder into the realm of matter... we ought rather hail it as the creator and governor of the realm of matter.
This quandary is like the Zen Koan, a riddle or a paradox. OK one has a satori, an AH HA, and yet this only may say to the mind my curiosity is for the moment satisfied, in the few brief AH HA's, clear inspired nothingness I am with my still illusion-ed and feverish mind looking at the walls and my body; not solid, made of atoms which are more empty of substance with things buzzing and in constant movement, held together by their own movement and nothing else all this arising from nothing which is supposed to be not nothing but consciousness and so am I saying that this emptiness is consciousness and that the singularity zero potential quantum field is intelligent and that the observer of it collapses a wave form and how did the field get there anyway, black holes, worm holes, star gates, portals, the string theory, the theory of everything, quantum entanglement, what! and nothing is solid an appearance of solid oh gosh no wonder I am falling apart, after all at the very foundation there is nothing to hang your hat so to speak, no base, no foundation in this moving escalator the moving walkway. The path of no path and all that. Can I live with that?
Some say when we thoroughly have exhausted the search and quest to find out the origins of the Universe which are the origins of me/ you and I in a nutshell 'who am I' that when you can answer this and if you do one is merely giving a logical answer to shore up a belief of 'I really do exist and yet I doubt it because of my flimsy atomic structure'. The most I can say is; that I appear to be here until I am not. Can I live with this? Do I have to die physically to get my answer and maybe if there is no afterlife and oblivion, then asking the question is nonsense because there was no purpose if there is no perpetuity to life. Ah says the cellular biologist it merely to perpetuate the species and the survival of the fittest genes so that creation can evolve into a better new model of itself. So now the basic question still arises why if there no plan, an accident, no purpose, no god, no nothing, or maybe nothing is all there is and it arises out of that and we are back again.
Philosophers have wrestled with this and those on a so called spiritual path who feel consciousness is the answer and by exploring the consciousness by awareness of gazing with rapt attention and not seeking answers and allowing by non judgemental attention without intention at the mind, kind of like mind solving mind and awareness being aware of itself and what arises in itself until there is just awareness and no thought and just, just, just that pure awareness is the quantum field and is a kind of term we use for non scientific as God, Great Spirit, The Source and so on.
Of course someone, namely me, who ever that is, will come and spoil it all and ask;well who created awareness and consciousness then? Maybe some argue that there really is not anything solid and the appearance of form is a kind of trick of habit and agreed paradigm in the end anything put forward is mere conjecture and the scheme of things over billions of years and maybe to come, does anything matter? The past has gone a faded dream if we let it go and reproduce it as our future and the future not here only if we dream it so. So what now. Have a cup of tea and wake up. That seems to me as good an idea thought at this moment in illusion's time. Time oh gosh, it really only exists in the mind that also is only a notion, for some a mind is only content and remembering and juxtaposing the thoughts in it to present more computation scenarios which blind the awareness as to origins then I may ask what are thoughts but collected experiences and do they take us to who am I or to merely an assumption of a series of memories stuck together and may say; a film star, a vicar, a male, a female and this still does not take us back to the fundamentals. When the image of illusion such a retirement, an accident robs us of out identity through thought conjuring, we are back at creations and foundations door banging and clamouring for God's take who am I?
Since we do not know if god exists or if god does exist and is invisible who are we really asking? If we say we are asking ourself then we are back to who is this self.
So we have a Universe built on the building blocks of the the particle / atom structure and it is known the atom is 99.99% empty and yet here one is a solid entity or at least coalesced into form, held together by strong / weak nuclear forces and the actions of centripetal and centrifugal forces and gravity. Then we have the view of a great scientist The stream of knowledge is heading towards a non-mechanical reality; the Universe begins to look more like a great thought than like a great machine. Mind no longer appears to be an accidental intruder into the realm of matter... we ought rather hail it as the creator and governor of the realm of matter.
In an interview published in The Observer (London), when asked the question "Do you believe that life on this planet is the result of some sort of accident, or do you believe that it is a part of some great scheme?", he replied:
Many other scientists echo similar views such as Bohr, Heisenberg, Einstein, Plank and yet the lingering doubt where did consciousness arise from. Here we are back on the hamster wheel or the moebius strip and many philosophers and Gurus who hold the consciousness view.This quandary is like the Zen Koan, a riddle or a paradox. OK one has a satori, an AH HA, and yet this only may say to the mind my curiosity is for the moment satisfied, in the few brief AH HA's, clear inspired nothingness I am with my still illusion-ed and feverish mind looking at the walls and my body; not solid, made of atoms which are more empty of substance with things buzzing and in constant movement, held together by their own movement and nothing else all this arising from nothing which is supposed to be not nothing but consciousness and so am I saying that this emptiness is consciousness and that the singularity zero potential quantum field is intelligent and that the observer of it collapses a wave form and how did the field get there anyway, black holes, worm holes, star gates, portals, the string theory, the theory of everything, quantum entanglement, what! and nothing is solid an appearance of solid oh gosh no wonder I am falling apart, after all at the very foundation there is nothing to hang your hat so to speak, no base, no foundation in this moving escalator the moving walkway. The path of no path and all that. Can I live with that?
Some say when we thoroughly have exhausted the search and quest to find out the origins of the Universe which are the origins of me/ you and I in a nutshell 'who am I' that when you can answer this and if you do one is merely giving a logical answer to shore up a belief of 'I really do exist and yet I doubt it because of my flimsy atomic structure'. The most I can say is; that I appear to be here until I am not. Can I live with this? Do I have to die physically to get my answer and maybe if there is no afterlife and oblivion, then asking the question is nonsense because there was no purpose if there is no perpetuity to life. Ah says the cellular biologist it merely to perpetuate the species and the survival of the fittest genes so that creation can evolve into a better new model of itself. So now the basic question still arises why if there no plan, an accident, no purpose, no god, no nothing, or maybe nothing is all there is and it arises out of that and we are back again.
Philosophers have wrestled with this and those on a so called spiritual path who feel consciousness is the answer and by exploring the consciousness by awareness of gazing with rapt attention and not seeking answers and allowing by non judgemental attention without intention at the mind, kind of like mind solving mind and awareness being aware of itself and what arises in itself until there is just awareness and no thought and just, just, just that pure awareness is the quantum field and is a kind of term we use for non scientific as God, Great Spirit, The Source and so on.
Of course someone, namely me, who ever that is, will come and spoil it all and ask;well who created awareness and consciousness then? Maybe some argue that there really is not anything solid and the appearance of form is a kind of trick of habit and agreed paradigm in the end anything put forward is mere conjecture and the scheme of things over billions of years and maybe to come, does anything matter? The past has gone a faded dream if we let it go and reproduce it as our future and the future not here only if we dream it so. So what now. Have a cup of tea and wake up. That seems to me as good an idea thought at this moment in illusion's time. Time oh gosh, it really only exists in the mind that also is only a notion, for some a mind is only content and remembering and juxtaposing the thoughts in it to present more computation scenarios which blind the awareness as to origins then I may ask what are thoughts but collected experiences and do they take us to who am I or to merely an assumption of a series of memories stuck together and may say; a film star, a vicar, a male, a female and this still does not take us back to the fundamentals. When the image of illusion such a retirement, an accident robs us of out identity through thought conjuring, we are back at creations and foundations door banging and clamouring for God's take who am I?
Since we do not know if god exists or if god does exist and is invisible who are we really asking? If we say we are asking ourself then we are back to who is this self.
SHACK
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THE 5G ROLL OUT AND CALIFORNIAN FIRES IN PARADISE USA
IN
WWW.GEOFFFREED.COM
POSTS 359 A 5G AND POST 360 CALIFORNIAN FIRES
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THE 5G ROLL OUT AND CALIFORNIAN FIRES IN PARADISE USA
IN
WWW.GEOFFFREED.COM
POSTS 359 A 5G AND POST 360 CALIFORNIAN FIRES
No comments:
Post a Comment